The AI vibe-coding paradox & lessons we can take from previous tech hypes

The Rise of AI-Driven Programming Tools
In today's technology landscape, we're seeing the emergence of AI-driven programming tools like Cursor, GitHub Copilot and Manus. These tools promise a revolution in software development: faster development, lower costs, and accessibility to a wider audience. But does this democratization of programming automatically solve our IT problems? The reality is more nuanced.
The Democratization of Software Development
AI-driven programming tools significantly lower the threshold for writing code. They make it possible for:
Non-programmers to build simple applications (write code based on vibes instead of experience)
Developers to code faster with fewer errors
Companies to create custom applications without large IT teams
At first glance, this development seems like a major breakthrough. If more people can code, surely we can solve more problems?
Parallels with the Big Data Revolution
To understand the impact of AI programming tools, we can learn from the big data revolution we experienced earlier. When big data emerged, the promise was that organizations would make better decisions with more data. In practice, however, it turned out that:
More data doesn't magically lead to better insights
The quality of data is more important than quantity
Data only becomes valuable when properly integrated into business processes
Organizations that were successful with big data invested in data governance, data engineers, and data modelers. They ensured high-quality data that was trusted throughout the organization and could create real value. Companies that blindly acquired tools were disappointed with high cloud bills and few insights.
The Pitfall of AI-Generated Code
Just as with data, we see a similar risk with AI-generated applications. When creating code becomes easier, we'll likely see the following happen:
An explosion of small, specific applications within organizations
Less attention to architecture and integration
Technical debt accumulating faster
Without proper management, a new form of "application pollution" emerges - a proliferation of applications that nobody knows exactly what they're for or how they relate to each other, with all the consequences and risks that entails.
The Solution: Thoughtful Application Management
To truly derive value from AI programming tools, organizations must invest in:
Strategic Planning
Before a new application is built, consideration must be given to:
What business problem does this application solve?
How does it fit into the existing application landscape?
Which processes will be affected?
Application Lifecycle Management
Just as important as building new applications is managing the lifecycle:
Documentation of purpose and functionality
Regular evaluation of use and value
A clear process for phasing out outdated applications
Integration and Orchestration
Individual applications must:
Integrate well with existing systems
Use centrally managed data
Contribute to broader business goals
The Human Factor Remains Crucial
The rise of AI programming tools undoubtedly changes the technology landscape. The costs of creating code are decreasing, opening up new possibilities for innovation. But just as with the big data revolution, we'll see that technology alone is not sufficient.
The real value comes from thoughtful implementation and integration. Organizations that successfully use AI programming tools will invest not only in the technology itself but also in the processes and people who ensure this technology is effectively deployed.
As we look ahead to a world where code and applications are easier to create, we must not forget that the real challenge lies not in writing more code, but in building valuable and well-integrated systems.
As is actually already the case now.